under British and Australian laws a jury in criminal case has no access to information about the defendants past criminal record. this protect the person who is being accused of the crime. some lawyers has suggested that this practice should be change and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach to their decision about the case. do you agree or disagree?
Privet zone is to society what water to trees. In a number of countries such as Britannia and Australia a tribunal can't have convenience to prior case file. However, Some lawyers claim that accessibility to these records could be beneficial. The truth is a lot more complicated.
Topping the merits of reaching to prior records is precise judgment. These lawyers claim that the crime that one person had done in past hasn't relation to each other and this might lead to a better conclusion for a board. In fact, the crimes have any relation to each other and each one has own reason. For instance, a person who stolen stuff from the market many years ago and after numerous years he was arrested for drinking alcohol while driving, this two have no logical relation to each other. Also, past documents might have adverse impact in jury decision.
At first blush, do forbidden access to previous evidence might across as a problem, but these records must be privet because each crime has independent punishment. Obviously, previous file can effect on jury while the prior crimes are gone and the person experiences his punishment. Moreover, protecting the privet zone of people is responsibility of laws and government and this is a right, not privilege. Accessibility to these records in the name of the law can be imitating than liberty.
In the final analysis, laws must protect liberty, justice, and privet zone of citizens and imitating this right in the name of laws is unacceptable. Also, this accessibility is against individual freedom and lead to miss decision by jury that is visible cruelty. As a result not only inhibit jury to get last records is necessary but also new laws is an urgent need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-22 | alifarokh1 | 73 | view |
- under British and Australian laws a jury in criminal case has no access to information about the defendants past criminal record this protect the person who is being accused of the crime some lawyers has suggested that this practice should be change and t 73
- the graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over five years summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...h as Britannia and Australia a tribunal cant have convenience to prior case file. Ho...
^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... crime that one person had done in past hasnt relation to each other and this might l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89347079038 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67266039133 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6291695175 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265308138939 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803586119986 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540435837089 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152257186814 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327792898835 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...h as Britannia and Australia a tribunal cant have convenience to prior case file. Ho...
^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... crime that one person had done in past hasnt relation to each other and this might l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89347079038 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67266039133 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6291695175 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265308138939 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803586119986 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540435837089 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152257186814 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327792898835 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.