People are consuming more and more sugar-based drinks. Why? What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption
It is true that there is a rapid increase in the use of sugary beverages by humans. There are a number of reasons behind this tendency and several solutions should be adopted by the government and individuals to improve this situation.
There are two primary reasons why consumers use more and more sweet drinks. One reason is that due to developed technology, there are a huge number of advertisement campaigns involved in sugary drinks. They are so attractive and viral, and as a result, appeal to many people, especially teenagers. Another reason is that sugary beverages commonly contain addictive substances. Therefore, drinkers will have a tendency to use them on a daily basis.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. The first solution would be that companies and firms should curb the amount of sugar and addictive substances in many types of drinks and replace them by ingredients that do good for health. Furthermore, the government should charge a tax on sugary beverages to impose restrictions on demand. For instance, if the expense of them adds up, some consumers will not have the ability to purchase these drinks as they did. As a result, the demand will be less and the use of them will be limited. Another measure is that the authority should raise awareness of people, especially teenagers by educating, making campaigns about the effects of overusing sugary drinks.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are serious reasons for using increasingly sweet beverages, and steps need to be taken to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | huy12345 | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | trần thị như minh | 84 | view |
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 67
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 67
- With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas 73
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 84
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving the languages of a few speakers from dying out completely Others think this is a waste of financial resources Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...individuals to improve this situation. There are two primary reasons why consum...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tendency to use them on a daily basis. Fortunately, several measures could be t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he effects of overusing sugary drinks. In conclusion, it is clear that there ar...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09652509653 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77644033269 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521235521236 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.053404043 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172373274332 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568136703252 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596849859295 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880020783317 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499326277493 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.