Rembrandt
The article states that the painting is not a work by Rembrandt, but rather a derivative. However, the professor explains that the painting is by Rembrandt himself and refutes each of the points made in the reading.
Firstly, the article says that the clothing of the womanin the painting is inconsistent since she is a wearing a white linen cap, often worn by servants but also dorns a luxurious fur collar that the servant wouldn’t have been able to afford. The professor believes that there are certain flaws with the author’s position. He states that the fur collar was a later addition to the painting and was not present in the original piece made by Rembrandt. This finding was supported by an X-Ray and further analysis of the painting chemicals, which claim that the coat was added approximately 100 years after the original, with an intention to incease the painting’s intrinsic value.
Secondly, the reading posists that the light and shadow on the face and corresponding properties of the fur are inconsistent. Moreover, such a fallacy is not expected from Rembrnadt due to his mastery of light and shadow details. However, the professor points out that the fur collar was a later addition and the original painting consisted of a light coloured top. The reflective property of the lightly coloured garment made the lights and shadows seen on the face consistent with expectations.
Lastly, the excerpt contends that the back of the painting suggests that the painting was made on a panel of several pieces of wood gluaed together, which is unlike Rembrandt’s characteristsic of using a single wood panel. The professor opposes this point by saying that the original painting was made of a single piece of wood and a later modification to this painting added these extra pieces of wood to make it larger and grand. He goes on to say that the piece of wood used by Rembrandt in this painting is the same as the one use by him to make another self portait of his.
As you can see, the author and professor hold very different views on whether this painting was curated by Rembrandt or not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- Rembrandt 52
- Sale of fossils 81
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 76
- Do you agree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Old friend new friend 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70114898784 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.890583472 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165643212352 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082442104635 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999455802667 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137363709734 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108121118007 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70114898784 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.890583472 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165643212352 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082442104635 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999455802667 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137363709734 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108121118007 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.