“Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down. Others, however, believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.”
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In those years, animal’s welfare has become a subject of controversy; and it has been argued that beast should be free. On the other hand, there are a number of arguments assume that beast incarceration protects human.
On my opinion, animals are known for their loyalty and playful characteristics; therefore, they should be treated with respect and love. Consequently, zoos are useful for a plethora of reasons; it may be used as a home to endangered species; that’s why zoos act as a shelter for these animals. Zoos also may use as an educational tool; when families visit the zoo, they get to witness animals which may not be possible to view in their local region. It also can consider as an entertainment source due to going to a facility to look at animals for fun, seeing how trainers feed the animals and work with them. Zoos can be a local, national or international attraction that people want to see. The facilities create good-paying jobs, encourage entrepreneurs to be active in their community and provide indirect benefits to local businesses as well.
On the other hand, zoos are frequently viewed as cruel place for animals to live in. There are several explanations for this point of view. Firstly, imagine being caged, locked away from the outside word and living in closed, unfamiliar and unsanitary place for the rest of your life. These boxes prevent natural growth in animals since they cannot provide the same environment where they live. Secondly, when animals are born in captivity, they become dependent of humans that makes them slowly become inactive and attached to a man-made environment, consequently much so that they will either die alone in their prison or be unable to assimilate into their natural habitat again.
In short, zoos should only be used with the sole purpose of aiding in protecting and preserving endangered species. They should not be used as mere destinations for human entertainment. Instead of expanding zoos, we should focus on rebuilding the habitats people took away from them and illegalizing overhunting and locking up creature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | amellia1607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | thuthao2000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | xuanmailonton | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 73
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In those years, animal’s welfare has bec...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04610951009 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80480010638 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593659942363 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.129496209 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321853237858 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113308250592 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689218165476 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189618966464 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059804415359 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.