Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people credit that humans are naturally built-in learders while others feel that administration skills can advance. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of naturally born learders. First, naturally built-in learders are gift of God given for them. So they are suitable for leardership. This leardership suppor, presumably, tends not only make them masters a certain skill but also they will naturally stand out in that are a while others struggle to reach the same position. Second, naturally born learders would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and imperative to knowledgeable human learders is to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, leardership skills can also be practiced by yourself. First, leardership is skills rally can learning through coaching, awareness, practice and experience over time. Good learders always know how to research and seize development opportunities to help them lear more skills. Second, whoever can learning basic about leardership because you just have to try you will be successful. To be a learders in a structured environment, you need training. Most people can learn to manage, start a business, or lead a project thank to the concept of rules-based management-rules that can be learned and mastered. It, would be far more leardership viable option if a certain individual is willing to rise above a crowd that is called leardership.
I were discussed both view. In my opinion, if you have born leardership skills is very good but it only really grows when you try.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-29 | Tramtrr.21 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | Anonymous | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-06 | Harman97 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-24 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | phuong anh nguyen chin chin | 73 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 78
- People only work hard for money and there are no other reasons for doing that To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Some people think that should bailiwick the science of food and how to compose it Others think th 61
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while other believe that children should be free to do what they want Discussed both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
... a crowd that is called leardership. I were discussed both view. In my opinion, if ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, while, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024911032 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00580105534 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0925615174 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6470588235 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251670607318 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828468848782 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836866669613 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172156569144 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633072244046 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.