A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Today in many institutions we see people from different backgrounds study together share their thoughts and build their careers in life. When you look closer into these institutions and the students studying we find that one student is completely different from the other in terms of their understanding level of the subject matter that they are studying in college. But this works in a good way. During college, we do find some students who have a very quick grasp on some subjects matter. Is eventually because of the earlier education curriculum they had in their schools. Like if you take an example in India, there is a national board curriculum that runs in the schools owned by the national government, which according to Indian students is considered to be easy as compared to other boards of education owned by the state government. Although this creates a difference in education level achieved by students, this education does help the student over bonding and collaboration to solve challenging problems in higher education.
The prompt suggests that a nation should enforce a common national curriculum for all the students until they enter college. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this notion of providing a common level of knowledge untill schooling level.
This needs to be implemented because after entering college students tend to feel inferior to the students who know more and eventually it is noticed that their interest in studies has been degraded. Although the student was a topper of his school he/she now finds it difficult to manage the college studies as they feel the curriculum is tougher now. A similar situation can happen with the good students in college, they find the syllabus and curriculum easy and do not intend to pay much attention during their college days, eventually because of their overtime negligence they tend to miss many important and crucial things which pins them back in future.
If students were to have the same understanding level of the concepts when they enter in high education this feeling of inferiority would never exist. Students would be more relate to each other and collaborate with each other more in solving the challenges. This is a way we can create peace in an adolescent mind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and crucial things which pins them back in future. If students were to have the same ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngs which pins them back in future. If students were to have the same understa...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can create peace in an adolescent mind.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.032 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68129322032 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.72705891 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13333333333 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314777763211 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104679907876 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120405429366 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201724273984 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089140501744 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...and crucial things which pins them back in future. If students were to have the same ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ngs which pins them back in future. If students were to have the same understa...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can create peace in an adolescent mind.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.032 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68129322032 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.72705891 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13333333333 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314777763211 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104679907876 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120405429366 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201724273984 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089140501744 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.