some people believe that damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement of living standards. Do you agree or disagree?
It is said that improving the quality of people’s life would inevitably result in environmental loss. Although such phenomenon is prevalent in developing countries, it is imperative to combine our development with the well-being of nature.
Fostering an economy necessitates the exploitation of various natural resources. Apparently, to build a residential area, many swaths of forests will be felled, or to fuel the development of industrial section, different natural sources of energy, such as coal and oil, are exploited. More importantly, these extractive practices are of the essence to the growth of many developing countries, as not only can they create employment but also generate higher incomes for the whole nation. Therefore, to a certain extent, the betterment of certain countries, based on the enormous consumption of natural resources, would lead to loss of animal habitat and different types of pollution, which is evident in China where the level of atmospheric pollution is commensurate with that of its industrial growth.
However, in the long term, enhancements in humans’ life should be integrated into the integrity of environment. Humans require clean water, fresh air and the uncontaminated environment to actually survive and thrive. Consequently, were we unable to minimize the impacts of natural extractive activities, many would be likely prone to a variety of health problems, such pneumonia or lung cancer. Furthermore, damage to the nature also effects climate change, which leads to the higher frequency of natural hazards and ultimately, human existence could be threatened. As a result, sustainable development should be emphasized. For example, usage of green and renewable energy, like solar energy ought to be increased, while environmentally damaging activities, such as illegal logging, are to be fined and condemned.
In conclusion, even though the expansion of some economies will occur at the cost of nature, it is necessary to consider and gradually adopt other developing methods that are beneficial to society as well as the environment.
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- as well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 89
- Some people believe that handwriting is no longer useful in the modern world and should not be taught in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree 100
- Music and other arts seem to be features of every society In what ways are music and other arts important for societies and for individuals 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logging, are to be fined and condemned. In conclusion, even though the expansion...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58934169279 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18955003562 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0793048272 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.153846154 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575462381908 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243440694488 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380225124442 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0397075075927 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263694715013 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.