The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer's total sales in North America, South America, Europe and Asia.
The bar chart highlights the proportion of automobiles consumed in four different regions of the world by a car business between 2006 and 2010.
From the data in the above graph, it is apparent that while the percentages of cars sold in Asia went up significantly, the opposite was true in South America. In addition, the figures for the rest areas remained relatively stable over the period shown.
In 2006, Asia and Europe are the company’s two largest market shares with 30% of cars purchased, just 1% higher than in South America. By contrast, the motor car sales in North America recorded the lowest rate, only 11% in total. Two years later, the number of cars acquired in Asia and Europe both rose to 35% and 37% sequentially. Meanwhile, the converse trend occurred in the other continents.
In 2010, 50% of the manufacturer’s revenue came from Asia, whereas those in Europe and South America declined substantially to 30% and 9% respectively. Besides, auto sales in North America, which fell to 5% in 2009, rebounded to 11%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | Little_key | view |
- The line diagram outlines information about the number of clients of five correspondence administrations worldwide through the span of 10 years beginning from 1998 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 78
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations 84
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94318181818 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80697920039 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653409090909 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6802692767 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478693214894 0.215688989381 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156653545156 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105242889548 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232585820313 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114130976769 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.