The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates the amount of electricity production from three different sources of energy which New York used from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the number of people in New York who consumed petroleum and natural gas increased enormously over the period shown. In contrast, there was a considerable decline in the figures for ones who used coal in this city.
Consumed about 350kwh by New Yorkers in 1980, Petroleum was by far the highest sources of energy which supplied New York city. For the next 5 year, there was a sharp soar in the amount of electricity production from petroleum for New Yorkers until this figure peaked at 600kwh in the year 1985. From 1985 to 1990, the consumption of petroleum in New York fell dramatically before reaching the same level as the first year of the period.
Atfer that, these figures rocked sharply over the last period of 10 years and reached a peak of 700kwh in the last year.
Turning to coal and natural gas, from 1980 to 1985, New York witnessed a climb up in the number of people using coal. However, there was a period of stability in the amount of electricity produced from natural gas before it surged significantly and overtook that from coal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | minhtran224 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 78
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74761904762 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48241433938 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.0277585144 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319159193857 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146522698611 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143179926497 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192995896222 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173242819766 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.