The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts show how much a UK school spent on different costs in three separate years – 1981, 1991 and 2001.
According to all years, it can be blatantly seen that, expenditure on teachers’ salaries has the greatest percentages; starting from 40% in 1981 it increases by 5 % in 1991 and drops 45% in 2001. Expenditure on other workers’ salaries had the second highest percentages during 1981 and 1991 (28 and 22% respectively) which decreased significantly to 15 % in 2001.
Although, spending on resources such as books and fur nature and equipment had the identical patterns in 1981 (15%)...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2019-11-11 | Pamela K | 56 | view |
2019-09-19 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 78 | view |
2019-08-04 | Abimbola1 | 78 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 66
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in workplace. Others believe that the true function of universities should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course 60
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 45
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 50
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 189 200
No. of Characters: 925 1000
No. of Different Words: 110 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.708 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.894 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.845 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 53 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.476 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.816 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4