The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The bar graph compares the how various film market between two countries, namely Australia and the UK, in 2001. Whereas the line graph represents the pattern of admission in Australia and the UK between 1976 and 2006.
Overall, it can be inferred that the US films shared the majority of Fortune in the bones of the nation, in 1960. However, it is noticeable that the number of admissions had risen significantly after 1980 in both countries.
To begin with, at the first glance it can be observed that, nearly 5% of Australians and Britishers liked Australian films and other films, respectively. In contrast, more than 15% of Australian citizens accounted for other types of films. Furthermore, the US films opted for approximately 67% by the Australian people, while the UK had seen ahead by around 10%. Nevertheless, 20% of the UK films were screened in the UK, which was only 5% in Australia.
Proceeding further, in 1976, almost 100 million admissions had been recorded in the UK in cinema, which was far higher than in Australia. However, it decreased by 60 million, in 1985. In that meantime, the Australian admission figure fluctuated. Afterwards, from 1985 to 2005 the figure for Australian admission rose marginally with some fluctuation and stood at 80 million. Similarly, just below 160 million from 60 million gained admission number, in the UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-20 | unkownme2020@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | manuseth09 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-15 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | asmita acharya | 61 | view |
- It is believe that advertising can say a lot about a country To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The graph below shows the changes in maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2007 78
- Tourism has negative environmental impacts on tourist areas What are these impacts How can damage impacts be lessened 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The bar graph compares the how various film market between two countri...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y 5% of Australians and Britishers liked Australian films and other films, respec...
^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from 60 million gained admission number, in the UK.
^^
Line 7, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 60 million gained admission number, in the UK.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05752212389 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8757419783 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8485127241 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9230769231 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363290639967 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115570887791 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823648762377 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187033060097 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906966565606 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.