Whether parents should arrange a lot of extra activities outside school?
Whether parents should arrange a lot of extra activities outside school?
I acknowledge that these enrichment activities are advantageous; however, I consider them beneficial but secondary.
So, what are the primary or the most significant elements for children's success and development at an early age?
My answer is the environment. More specifically, a parental-established environment.
Because kids learn how to speak and act, how to be curious and creative, and deal with setbacks all through people around them. From the people closest to them, most of their parents, kids are modeling habits and forming the earliest attitudes toward the external world.
Therefore, instead of sending your kids to piano or chess classes, the more effective way of promoting your kids' development is you, as a good example. Parents who are always earnest in exploring the world and curious about new knowledge will shape kids' minds in the same way. Shaping the mind is prior to the outside school interest classes, or kids can not fully adopt the knowledge in the best way from the enrichment activities.
Check out whether there is curiosity, diligence, or imagination in your daily context. If you do not possess these values, then change your mindset and live it out loud. After your, your kids will follow up on what you did every day surprisingly.
The dynamic environment of your home is an excellent class for your kids. Therefore, I believe parents should not arrange extra activities outside the school before kids are internally well prepared.
- the school year should be rearranged 90
- Define your own way of life challenging but crucial
- Whether parents should arrange a lot of extra activities outside school 61
- 4 Whether children can benefit a lot from taking care of pets 90
- I encourage university art students to take science related classes 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90394490306 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9812296745 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273342578767 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119637251166 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261212282944 0.0667982634062 391% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189645178818 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320870849119 0.056905535591 564% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90394490306 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9812296745 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273342578767 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119637251166 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.261212282944 0.0667982634062 391% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189645178818 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.320870849119 0.056905535591 564% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.