the chart below shows the average spending on cloths per person in US in 1985 1995 and 2005
The bar graph illustrates the changes in the expenditure on clothes for four different categories including boys, girls, men, and the women in three distinct years in the US. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, women are spending a huge amount of money on clothes when compared to the other three groups, whereas boys spend the least amount in all the given years. Moreover, expenditure on women's clothes increased in 2005 by over 600 dollars which is the highest among the four groups.
In terms of boy's and girl's clothes, the amount spent was below 200 dollars in all three years. However, in 2005 spending on girl's clothes rose to over 100 dollars when compared to boy's clothes with below 100 dollars.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out for men's clothes was around 300 dollars in 1985 in contrast to women's clothes with 500 dollars. While, after ten years the expenditure exceeded over 400 dollars for both genders. Furthermore, US men reduced the amount of money on clothes in the last year by 400 dollars while women spent the highest amount in 2005.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-22 | zee7 | 78 | view |
2022-12-23 | kevann | 61 | view |
2022-12-23 | kevann | 61 | view |
2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 78 | view |
2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 61
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 76
- The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79679144385 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29231571031 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502673796791 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7064994787 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177188672558 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781776759034 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562681346157 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114737468121 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326355091226 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.