some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Other think that building more wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both view and give your opinion
It is often argued by some that spending money on metro and train line constructions would be better to reduce traffic blocks. Whereas others believe that wider roads would be minimise a great percentage of clogging. this essay intends to explain in detail both views.
On the one hand, it is a good idea to build new metro services and railways to tackle the city congestion. Major cities around the world often suffer the difficulties of traffic problems due to overcrowded private vehicles and lack of space for pedestrians. Since the dawn of the metro and railway reduces the traffic suffocation and mitigate the use of private cars for silly matters. Similarly, in terms of railway lines, it would be a great change in traffic blocks because many people use these services for long journeys, and convenient space inside the train, cost-effective also would attract many to some extent.
On the other hand, people who argued about expanding the road spaces also have tremendous benefits in congestion irrespective of land space. Constructing the wider roads helps the vehicle can pass three or four lines at a time, as well as a one-way route, which would enhance the travel speed to the core. Nevertheless, it could not be practical in cities with limited land areas or farmland including trees and natural amenities. For instance, the majority of Indian cities are overpopulated and exacerbation of slums and therefore over bridges or metros might be helpful in these circumstances to get ride of traffic blocks.
To sum up, it would be wise govenrment decision to reduce traffic congestion through either innovative metro and railway services or to extent the road space. in my perception, novel technological development with metro and railway services could able to decrease the traffic blocks in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-20 | vialia | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-29 | nguyenson@_@ | 89 | view |
- some people think that in this todays world getting older is entirely bad however other people believe that the lives of older people are much better now than they were in the past discus both views and express your own opinion 73
- the chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK cities between 1989 and 2009 82
- The table below provides information on rental charges and salaries in three areas of London 73
- the accompanying pie illustrations show the use of web based social networking y people in Australia in 2011 and 2014 73
- the chart below show the film participation in Australia and also shows the typical film trips of different age groups from 1996 to 2000 take a look at the data and select and announce key highlights 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld be better to reduce traffic blocks. Whereas others believe that wider roads would b...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...inimise a great percentage of clogging. this essay intends to explain in detail both...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y services or to extent the road space. in my perception, novel technological deve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74106832377 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9757867751 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232080832685 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828501449271 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660814689665 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151306262785 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058645425991 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uld be better to reduce traffic blocks. Whereas others believe that wider roads would b...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...inimise a great percentage of clogging. this essay intends to explain in detail both...
^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y services or to extent the road space. in my perception, novel technological deve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09666666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74106832377 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9757867751 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232080832685 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828501449271 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660814689665 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151306262785 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058645425991 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.