Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep. What problems can lack sleep cause?
It is complained by many people that debilitating diseases can result from sleep deprivation. However, this could be mitigated by reducing screen stimulation to help people to fall asleep faster.
Experiencing undersleeping affects one’s mental condition, leading to the inability to function daily. Simply put, the shorter one’s length of sleep is, the higher the cortisol hormone level someone produces due to insufficient rest for the brain. The increased cortisol hormone results in stress and further physical well-being. According to a study conducted by McKinsey in 2019, around 70% of Jakarta workers had a gastric problem due to feeling stress after pulling an all-nighter at the office and got only 5 hours of sleep throughout the years. This reduced their work performance score by more than 20% in one quarter. Hence, sleep deprivation eliminates the ability to function in the workplace.
Nonetheless, lacking sleep can be mitigated by reducing screen stimulation to raise the amount of melatonin hormone, the hormone of sleepy. This is because people would hardly fall asleep due to the blue light produced by the screen that tricks their brains into assuming they are still at noon. Hence, reducing blue light can lead to falling asleep faster. For instance, an experiment done by the NCBI suggested that around 50% of 1000 respondents admit to sleeping 3 hours earlier after reducing their screen time by 2 hours per day throughout a month. The research found an increase in respondents’ melatonin hormone production after lowering their screen exposure for a certain period. Thus, screen time restriction is necessary to help people fall asleep faster.
To conclude, even though undersleeping can be prevented by eliminating screen time, it inevitably leads to mental health problems. Hence, using a feature to limit screen time is necessary.
- Time Spent Per Activity of People in Several Countries From 1998 to 2009 85
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- In some countries people encourage students to find part time jobs while some people don t Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Gender Equality 67
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, nonetheless, so, still, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36394557823 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82220499582 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2276550752 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162275187665 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576108203366 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725041037792 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106580490379 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651947179964 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.