the accompanying pie illustrations show the use of web based social networking y people in Australia in 2011 and 2014.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of both genders using web-based social networks in Australia in 2011 and 2014. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, in 2011 women are more addicted to social networks compared to men and after three years the percentage of people using everyday web-based social networks increased in both genders.
As is observed, only 8% of women never used social networks in 2011 in contrast to men with 44%. Similarly, about 39% of women have used internet services every day which is ten per cent higher than men with 29%. While only 12% of men spend time on social networks once a week compared to 39% of women in 2011. Moreover, a few times a week users account for about 19% of men and 39% of women in the same year.
However, web-based social network users' accounts increased daily which is around 45% of men and 59% of women by 2014. Likewise, few time users and once a week users account also has reduced in both genders which is 16% and 9% of men and 9% and 10% of women respectively. In addition, 30% of men and 22% of women were never using this internet facility in 2014.
- the chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK cities between 1989 and 2009 82
- the map below illustrate a beachfront area in Australia between 1950 and today 78
- some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- personal satisfaction is declining in large urban communities what can be the explanation behind this what significant progress can be made to determine this issue 73
- the diagram below shows spending on five unique items for children 18 and multi year 2010 2014
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ee years the percentage of people using everyday web-based social networks increased in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58415841584 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37601071524 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9799948692 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327075424467 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15697789177 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17802758042 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274777413753 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159134359459 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.