The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates how the workers took part-time jobs in four countries of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
Overall, there was an increase in the percentage of part-time workers in England, Scotland and Wales, with Scotland witnessing the most dramatic rise, while an opposite trend can be seen in the figure for Northern Ireland. In addition, Wales had taken the highest place on the chart throughout the period.
The percentage of people who took part in part-time jobs in Wales started at just over 30% in 1980, after which it suffered a progressive rise to about 35% in 2010. A similar change can be seen in the figure for England, which had grown from approximately 25% in 1980 to precisely 30% by 2010.
Furthermore, only 10% of part-time workers in Scotland in 1980, with a subsequent significant increase to nearly 20% in 2010. The reverse trend can be seen in the figure for those living in Northern Ireland, decreasing lightly from around 15% in 1980 to 13% in 2010, just nearly remaing stable throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
- The bar chart below illustrates five different industries percentage share of Brazil s economy in 2009 and 2019 with a forecast for 2029 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86033519553 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62492559651 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541899441341 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1051618988 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206475503026 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108573074369 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868710293488 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151808577432 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773481316746 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.