the maps below show the changes of the community centre 10 years ago and at present
The two pictures compare the layouts of the community centre over the past 10 years. It is clear that there are noticeable changes in the layout of this centre over the period shown. The main modification have included the relocation and addition of many facilities.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that 10 years ago there was the garden in the northwest corner of the building. At present, this garden has been turned into inner sports. In addition, the four offices and the storage in the northeast corner have been removed to make way for a cafe area.
The two pictures also show that the storage space in the north has been shorten, creating space for the toilets on the right of the storage. Furthermore, the coffee bar in the south has been removed in order to a new office. Finally, the entrance, the reception, the car park in the southwest area as well as the main hall with 100 seats in the middle have remained
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below describe the numbers of people per household in 1995 and 2005 of an European country 66
- In many places the role of mother and father is changing Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'shortened'.
Suggestion: shortened
...the storage space in the north has been shorten, creating space for the toilets on the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54705882353 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34947538869 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4954541697 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211537953293 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743078263221 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825206518172 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123434511361 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072102617541 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'shortened'.
Suggestion: shortened
...the storage space in the north has been shorten, creating space for the toilets on the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54705882353 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34947538869 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4954541697 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211537953293 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743078263221 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825206518172 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123434511361 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072102617541 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.