The table shoes the percentage of young people who were working in different sectors in one country in 2005 and 2010.
The tabular data depicts the seven fields in which youngsters got employment in a country during 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it can be manifested that Social service was the most preferred sector in the initial year amongst the youngsters but it was overtaken by shops, restaurants and hotels in 2010. Interestingly, transport remained the least in both the years.
First of all, figures of 2005 indicate that the social service had the highest employed young people with figures of one-third. However, work done by them was the lowest in agriculture and transport at 5% each. Manufacturing as well as shops, restaurants and hotels had almost similar share with the former one having 21% while the latter one at 20%. Business and Other field did not have much share as it was 7% and 8% respectively.
Secondly, after half decade, shops, restaurants and hotels became the sector providing the highest employment rising by 12% and reached 32%. On the other hand, social service plummeted to 22%. Similarly, manufacturing dropped to 14% and 10% less of it was observed for Transport which was the least in that year. Lastly, business and other category slightly rose with both ending at 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | Jocelyn | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | Har preet singh | 85 | view |
- the table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 79
- You are some friend want to start a weekly dance club and you have found a hall that would be suitable to hold your meeting write a letter to the owner of the hall In your letter Explain your and your friends project Ask if it possible to rent the hall an 73
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand agree or disagree 92
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 89
- The graph below shows the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, well, while, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03535353535 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66559991672 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4408959227 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7272727273 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129330516878 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433091114995 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500916244407 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816075599582 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046766892054 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.