In twenty years there will be fewer cars than there are today.
As the population is increasing with time, so do the use of cars which has also increased traffic problems. In order to curb the rush and pollution, the government has started an initiative to motivate people to use public transport. Therefore, I agree that sooner there will be fewer cars running on the road in comparison with today. I feel this way for a few reasons which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, the increase in population has also increased the demand for cars which has led to increase in air pollution. Thereby, the government has shown concern for environmental protection by curbing the excess use of automobiles. For instance, In Delhi, the capital city of India, air pollution has crossed its highest level due to many factors such as release of harmful gas from industries, the burning of crops, etc. Therefore, In order to improve the air quality, the Indian government has restricted the use of automobiles and advised them to use public transport available. Similarly, in other parts of the world, countries are also taking action to protect the environment by reducing the burning of car fuel. Hence, as global warming has affected the world badly, people are also worried about the earth's condition. Consequently, it will also lead to a reduction in the use of cars to protect the world from release of harmful gases leading to pollution.
Secondly, as mentioned earlier, the increase in population has increased the demand for cars which has also led to traffic problems. Evidently, people are buying cars so that they can reach their destination easily and conveniently in a shorter period of time. However, when there will be a crowd on the road, then obviously traffic will increase and it will cause delays to reach the place. Eventually, people will switch to using public transport which will not only save their time from getting stuck in the traffic but also save money by not spending on fuels. This is best demonstrated by my personal experience, my boss who used to come office in his expensive car but when he started to get stuck in the traffic for long hours, he got frustrated because he always gets late. So he finally decided to use the metro to reach the office, and he is also happy because now he does not face the traffic rush and irritating sound of vehicles horn. Consequently, due to this problem, many people have also decided to opt for other options than getting stuck in the long traffic by using their car.
In conclusion, I m of the opinion that an increase in population has led to a reduction in the number of cars because of an increase in pollution and because an increase in road traffic. Hence, I believe that the number of cars will definitely reduce in the future as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Extended family importance 73
- Young people enjoy their life more than old people 66
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problem 50
- People learn better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co worker than from those at a higher level such as teacher or supervisors 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...on easily and conveniently in a shorter period of time. However, when there will be a crowd on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7625 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64337484204 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8849537767 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.3 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174787036571 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639949679011 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808093077195 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11945509112 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541771396917 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.