The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph demonstrates the average amount of greenhouse gas (CO2) emitted per person in three countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the average CO2 emissions per person in Italy and Portugal gradually grew over the 40-year period. Whereas, the United Kingdom and Sweden both showed a steady decrease during the same period.
Looking more closely at the graph, one can see that Britain was ranked the highest in CO2 emissions in 1967 with nearly 11 metric tonnes, but witnessed a slow fall during the years after and hit a low of roughly 9 tonnes in the final year. In the first year, the average amount of carbon dioxide emitted per Swedish was at nearly 9 tonnes. In spite of a sudden surge in 1977, this country's statistics shrink consistently in the remaining years and hit a low of 5 tonnes in 2007.
It can be said that Italy and Portugal nearly showed the same tendancy when both of their figures grew steadily over the 40-year period. Although started with the lowest average carbon dioxide compared to the others, Portugal did not witness any decrease in its figures and peaked at relatively 6 tonnes in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-04 | levanhoan123 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that the media such as the press TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled Are you for or against this view 89
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Some people believe that the media such as the press TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled Are you for or against this view 89
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arbon dioxide emitted per Swedish was at nearly 9 tonnes. In spite of a sudden su...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, so, whereas, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76119402985 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32830505531 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6733256691 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254029676685 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117361271384 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588753903253 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168964051166 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556294041295 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.