Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In this age of change, it is sometimes argues that the youth ought to assist people without any payment. Despite the fact that there are some benefits, I do not concur with this statement due to the risks it presents.
On the one hand, the notion of unpaid working has roots in two main reasons. Firstly, it is presumably useful and righteous to help the financially-disadvantaged to ameliorate their life. It could be explained that with the aid of some charity organizations, the poor could lessen the overwhelming financial burden. A prime example could be that free local restaurants which are open to serve absolutely support them not to bother to the food supplies which is a pretext to an active and energetic lifestyle. Secondly, the youth tended to be more independent and responsible for their devotion to the society. In the long-term progress, they are completely reliant on their parents,thus, provoking them to work may be an effective method to have an exposure to the reality, which seems to a preparation to become an adult.
On the other hand, the drawbacks are attributable to overshadow the benefits. Firstly, working with the demand for money is considered to be an impetus to human. The rationale is that all juveniles work with a view to receive money as an incentives for themselves because of the great consummation and devotion. Secondly, it provokes the adolescent to incur psychological disorders. This is because they have faced up host of ongoing pressures of day-to-day life. Thus adding more social activities triggers a heavy pressure prompting effortlessly to depression, stress and poor academic performance.
To sum up, unpaid working could be beneficial but there are some negatively aforementioned causes. In the future, working with wages should be implemented, however, some paidless organizations are necessary to improve human life.
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 84
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 89
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve the crime Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 11
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... youth tended to be more independent and responsible for their devotion to the so...
^^
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
... are completely reliant on their parents,thus, provoking them to work may be an effec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an incentive' or simply 'incentives'?
Suggestion: an incentive; incentives
...es work with a view to receive money as an incentives for themselves because of the great co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ives for themselves because of the great consummation and devotion. Secondly, it ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19801980198 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19156077651 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7112625712 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176320725032 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506744765885 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425203029902 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108488655318 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504788680327 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.