The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates information about stealing per thousand expediencies in fours countries from 1990 to 1999.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a downward trend in both Great Britain, France and Canada expected for Sweden. In addition, Great Britain was the largest figure in most of the periods given.
It varied consistently during the period, starting at 18 robberies per thousand cars in 1990 Great Britain data fluctuated to 16 robberies per thousand cars in 1999. While those in France and Canada was between 5 to 7 per thousand cars from 1990 to 1999. In the first year , France’s figure was over 5 robberies per thousand cars, then it climbed to 8 robberies per thousand cars in one year later. There were some slight shifts around 6 robberies per thousand cars from 1992 to 1994. Afterward, it climbed to 7 robberies per thousand cars in the last year. About Canada data, it decreased from 8 to 5 robberies per thousand cars between 1990 to 1993, then it increased steadily to 7 robberies per thousand cars in 1999.
On the other hand, this trend in Sweden had a rise of robberies during the period. Between 1990 to 1992 it fluctuated around 9 robberies per thousand cars and stay unchanged till 1993. After that, it grew to 13 robberies in 1996 and peak at 14 robberies per thousand cars in 1999.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-09-03 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 67
- The line chart shows average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in the US from 2000 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 70
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'periods'' or 'period's'?
Suggestion: periods'; period's
...n was the largest figure in most of the periods given. It varied consistently during t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ars from 1990 to 1999. In the first year , France’s figure was over 5 robberies pe...
^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riod. Between 1990 to 1992 it fluctuated around 9 robberies per thousand cars and...
^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...14 robberies per thousand cars in 1999.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71982758621 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55907743236 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469827586207 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1299917907 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208038004401 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108992361007 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09514979663 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159679063287 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127149223441 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.