Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The proliferation of the tourism in this day and age has raised a challenging question about whether the industry itself brings more tension over coordination between those with different culture backgrounds. From my personal perspective, I would take a dim view with this opinion.
First and foremost, we are all acknowledge that traveling is the best ways to enrich our understanding. Since pictures, movies and books are never enough in satisfy ing human s’ hunger for new horizons, people come to traveling as a powerful means of widening their knowledge. Moreover, along with the huge amount of knowledge being obtained is a profound understanding about others’ traditions. Tourists would learn to respect and accept the host nation’s uniqueness which will consequently foster the harmony and integration across nations. However, it is undeniable that there are still a few tourists whose behaviours are inappropriate and hostile to the country’s inhabitants and the local environment.
The second point that should be taken into consideration is the positive effects of global tourism on a country’s economic and society. It is undeniable that more and more employments are being created thanks to the continuous development of international tourism. In terms of developing countries, this is not only help the poor to make ends meet but also alleviate the country’s economic burden. Take the Philippines as the prime example, given that 70% of their population depend on the tourist sector as their main income, the country’s economy was nearly on the verge of collapse when the Covid pandemic limited people’s traveling mobility.
In a nutshell, it is my belief that global tourism, as the dominant industry in this days and age, does more goods than harms to human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that organizing international sport events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s inhabitants and the local environment. The second point that should be taken in...
^^^
Line 6, column 81, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...al tourism, as the dominant industry in this days and age, does more goods than harm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3661971831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03784076159 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644366197183 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6261639015 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.545454545 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14849087164 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492943322511 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566096093972 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886099178031 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427452412213 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.