Q49. Countries are spending a lot of money hosting international events such as the World Cup and the Olympics. Is this useful or not? Discuss and give your opinion.
Recently, whether holding global events is beneficial or not has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that host nations can obtain a myriad of advantages from these events, while others argue otherwise. I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that global sporting events have a detrimental impact on host nations do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that these events allow host countries to get only short-term advantages for their economy even though they invested an astronomical amount of money. In addition, living costs in host countries soar, which has a negative influence on local people. To exemplify, a study conducted by the Seoul National University illustrates that the recent winter Olympics held in South Korea caused a dramatic increase in the prices of basic necessities, such as groceries and clothes, of almost 30% during the Olympic period. For these reasons, some people hold the view that hosting global competitions should not be encouraged.
My opinion, however, is that the benefits of global events are more significant. An obvious advantage is that facilities used for international spectacles lead to flourishing industries related to these events. Furthermore, these events contribute to positive awareness about the host country to global societies. To exemplify, the government of South Korea released the effect of the Olympics, which enabled the country's brand rank to go up from 22nd to 11th in 2019 and they asserted that the economic value of this is considered priceless. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that hosting global events exerts a positive influence on the country for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Q 11 Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings Discuss both views and g 84
- Q17 In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Q9 A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Wh 89
- Some people think living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ed a dramatic increase in the prices of basic necessities, such as groceries and clothes, of almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that hosting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27469135802 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80690320619 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608024691358 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.799148325 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231199196927 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687604789429 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423439075368 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140559821935 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397018957569 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.