Music is played in every society and culture in the world today.
Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies. Others, however, think that music can have a negative influence on both.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, music is something that appears nearly every part of the world. Some people propose that these melodies and tunes can have detrimental impacts on societies and individuals, while others believe that music only benefits humanity. This essay will discuss these two views and simultaneously show the reasons why I favour the latter.
On the one hand, there are several plausible explanations to some people's negative notions about music. It is true that some songs contain overwhelmingly dark lyrics, show listeners the writer's unhealthy and pessimistic views about life and even encourage them to commit suicide. Because of this perplexing issue, listening to these pieces can have an extremely negative influence on individuals, especially on those who are under mental problems or already have off-putting looks on life. However, I myself opine that even though some songs have toxic content, it is obvious that people can choose whether to play them or not due to the fact that they are basically songs which are incapable of existing without the activation of human beings. Policies might be implemented to put a total ban on these genres of music, and also strict laws for the musicians who composed them.
Despite numerous pessimistic thoughts about music, I do believe that the merits it brings about absolutely outweigh demerits mentioned. First and foremost, in terms of psychology and health, music has long been proven by scientists to have a number of positive effects on human beings, such as cheering people up, stimulating listeners to move on regardless of inner wounds in the past, as well as calming them down. When it comes to sociology and historical aspect, pieces of song help humanity learn about the old times through folklore rhythms, via songs, morden human know more about their ancestors and roots. Another intriguing fact is that a lot of creatures that once existed on Earth were acknowledged by analysing lyrics in old songs, which assists scientists with their research on Earth race.
In conclusions, in spite of some unremarkable disadvantages, songs do benefit humanity in many areas, play an important in social development as well as differentiating human from lower forms of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-03 | levanhoan123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | namviet | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Fedya | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-11 | sonicmaster | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-01 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19008264463 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73637349579 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617079889807 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9553962304 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.923076923 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9230769231 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224827221079 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823151382959 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07083998744 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134598996732 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869218571057 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.