People nowadays prefer to interact online (e.g. do shopping, chat with friends) rather than talking to other people face-to-face.
What are the reasons for this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Online interaction has become the norm nowadays. The phenomenon seems stem from the development of technology and modern lifestyle. The drawbacks of this trend compeltely outweigh their merits, both impacts will be elaborated below.
The boom of technological advances in recent years has enhanced many aspects of human's life. The first point is that technology breakthrough has deeply changed the ways people work, which improves efficiency and productivity. For instance, employees who once burdened with full of constant meetings now are being relieved with the support of applications holding conferences via internet. Technology development also has other implications on people's private life. With the advent of smart devices, the way people communicating has witnessed radical changes. Individuals tend to deploy telecommunication equipment to contact each other for unimportant issues such as chit chat or small talks instead of person meeting.
As human's basic needs have gradually fulfilled and standard of living has increased globally, human being's intention has shifted from focusing on making living to lifestyles that aim at balance between work and life. This causes workers to avoid work-related relationships which often associated with stress and pressure, and subsequently results in less direct face-to-face interaction. Similarly, contribution of individualism among the young is also a stimulus for less social interaction. This trend which has originated in western world now become popular in Asia nations.
In the light of these facts, I believe that the less direct social meeting between people would lead to misunderstanding and sometimes conflicts in societies. Thus, the movement may have detrimental impacts on humankind and deteriorate social solidarity.
In sum, lack of interactions in person in today's could attribute to new inventions in technological sector and human beings' lifestyle. This trend could lead to societal issues and lessen meaning relationships in our world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-28 | Md Mazedul Islam | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | Sevinch Olimova | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | hannahbui | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-23 | Titi2lope | 92 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crimes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- In recent years tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit However some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...both impacts will be elaborated below. The boom of technological advances in recen...
^^^
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s enhanced many aspects of humans life. The first point is that technology breakthr...
^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...of living has increased globally, human beings intention has shifted from focusing on ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...tions in technological sector and human beings lifestyle. This trend could lead to soc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, similarly, so, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76510067114 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12146922289 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3401941602 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.058823529 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210015324282 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591076744535 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452364694695 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935838566086 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454731030599 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.