The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, the adoption of social media has taken the place of in-person communication. While I accept that this phenomenon can be advantageous to some extent, I strongly believe that it is more likely to have negative impacts.
On the one hand, there are two notable upsides to social media mitigating in-person interactions. The first benefit is that social media is a powerful communication tool. The main reason for this is that it can allow citizens to contact other people regardless of geographic location. For example, students studying abroad can keep in touch with their families and friends on a daily basis by using the video call features from Skype, Facebook, or various other apps, thereby alleviating their homesickness and loneliness. Furthermore, the adoption of social media can enable citizens to approach the news immediately. In this digital age, information can be recorded and spread on various social media platforms in just a few seconds. To illustrate, the news about extreme weather conditions such as storms can be updated immediately for those using social media, thereby reducing the traffic accidents caused by extreme weather.
However, I would argue that the drawbacks of social media taking the place of in-person communication surpass the aforementioned benefits. To begin with, the overuse of social media has detrimental impacts on users’ well-being. When users squander too much time browsing social networks and exposure to blue light from smart devices frequently, they are likely to suffer from various diseases such as eye strain, weak eyesight, and brain damage due to the lack of outdoor activities. Moreover, the adoption of social media can reduce the quality of interpersonal communication. Many citizens who are addicted to social networking sites may stare at their screens during their families’ meals without paying attention to their beloved ones, therefore, distancing people from each other. This can make the users be more apathetic and likely to have alienation and cyberbullying due to the lack of real relationships.
In conclusion, after weighing the pros and cons, I would say that the advantage of the adoption of social media is overshadowed by the negative effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37677053824 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91371857883 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57223796034 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3728088639 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155178723964 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611221673134 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296090919751 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100571717676 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170396415508 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.