The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
To be trained to be leaders in industry, political institution or certain business company is an oppurtunity for potential youngsters. Within such train, it is comprehensive and versatile, especially in their corroboration ability, which could be trained by cooperation, and problem solving ability, which could have better results under the experience of competition. Thus, in my opinion, the claim that youngsters who will be trained to be leaders by instilling them in only cooperation environment is not accurate.
Admittedly, cooperation is not a trivial factor influencing managers and leaders. In private organizations, the importance of role of network shows conspicuous. It works not only when someone applies new jobs, but decides whether one could sit on the leader position or stay on it for a long time. This is because cooperation also means the leader candidate gets along with his subordinates or partners well, so they can be the leader candidate's foundation to be selected in a democracy mechanism. And in political world, cooperation plays a more important role for politicians, especially in president selection. Although politicians seem to be interchangeable and equitable, they are good at connecting local people by promising their target region warefare that will be given to people there to gain supportance, and cooperating certain elites to gain their support and relating strong relationships. Thus, cooperation is a foundation for governmental and industrial leader candidates.
However, what advantage mentioned before cannot eliminate other vital factors influencing theirto-become-leader process, in that even during the political selecting process, itself is not only a cooperation, but a competition when take a wider view.
First and foremost, leaders are versatile and roles solving heterogeneous problems by using their knowledge, experience, intelligence and interpersonal relationship, which is the least ability if that leader is in a civil society, because leader only possessing strong net work might have benefited the company to some extent but not to a long run. Moreover, a leader should be unflinching, which means that when the company meets tough problems, they need to figure out solutions while shouldering heavy stressful sitiations. Given the competition environment has made those leader candidates to position themselves into a drastical situation, an environment that will contain many desperations, they probably equip with so much courage and competence to face impossible solely.
To sum up, while the fact that cooperation is an indispensable ability of a leader, characteristics formed during competition are also vital for leaders. A successful manager in every field not only need to have strong network and cooperating ability, how to meet tough environment alone is vital
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-28 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-02 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- As acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 83
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the general manager of KNOW radio station Several factors indicate that radio station KNOW should shit its programming from rock and roll music to a continuous news format Consider for example that the number of 66
- The following appeared in a memo to the board ofdirectors ofBargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first productBargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Althoug 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65887850467 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33863053343 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6011382096 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128581198854 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529463027886 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498974194827 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746869545406 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047823861575 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65887850467 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33863053343 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6011382096 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 118.986275619 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128581198854 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529463027886 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498974194827 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746869545406 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047823861575 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.