The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015.
The line graph illustrates how many people from different age groups are attending music concerts from 2010 to 2015 in one city. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, most of the age groups show increasing trends in the graph except 55 to 64years group. However, the considerable growth in music concrete was the age group between 16 to 24 years old from 40% to 70% over the given year's and the least was 75years above which is in between 20% in the given year's.
Initially, 45 to 54 years old people are the top attendees in music concerts with about 52% while after one year the trend dipped to 40% even though they finished with 52% in 2015. Moreover, people between 25 to 44 years old also was 40% at the beginning, whereas it declines to 30% after three years before reached to 49% in 2015.
Regarding the age of 54 to 65 years group visited the music concert with 22% in 2010 whilst it remained steadily for almost two years then the graph rose to 30% in 2013. However, the trend plummeted to the beginning stage with 22% by 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | letrang250191 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Kimm2903 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | eyraen | 78 | view |
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups Describe the information shown to a university or college lecturer Write at least 150 words 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 38
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
- Many individuals prefer to talk online with their peers than going with individuals in surrounding networks do you think the benefis exceed the odds 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st was 75years above which is in between 20% in the given years. Initially, 4...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51832460733 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24561559427 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.91832772 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33557423647 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145040372365 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122925957611 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220863590414 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100983654469 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.