Some people think traveling abroad is necessary while others think that is not necessary because TV and the internet can give the same information. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
As we enter a new era of digits and big data, the way how we connect to the world has been changed dramatically. Those who expect to help themselves unwind and unplug from hustle and bustle in life or simply want to experience what life is like outside their home would choose the conventional way by locating themselves in another country. However, this process is perceived as redundant by some preferring to stay indoors, for technology has proved to be as informative.
Developing cultural awareness is one of the most rewarding part in taking a trip in other countries. This accumulative understanding of other cultures is a need of time and first-hand experience when people interact in person with foreigners who speak a different language and follow a different social ritual. Talking face to face with the local in host countries increases the odds of a traveller mastering a second language. After all, the easiest or maybe the most efficient way for a person from non-English speaking countries to speak it is to communicate with the English native speakers on a daily basis. Such cross-cultural exposure is also a useful source of information allowing overseas tourists to learn about exotic features through localized products. While it is true that people could buy nearly any type of foreign goods without stepping outside their home, the authentic creation and crafts of arts are rarely found in Amazon but to be sold from the local vendors in their destination.
Accessing information about facts, traditions and others in foreign countries by shifting scenery, however, is not reliant on a flying ticket any more. The internet is bridging the distance for all of us so that a good view of how people lead their life in the pristine villages or mountainous areas is easily available when people turn on the TV subscribing a travel programme or watch documentaries like BBC or Discovery. Learning a second language does not necessarily need people to set themselves in a different geographical location, either; instead, various language learning courses, movies and electronic literature can be found online and many of them are even free of charge. In such case, there is no need for language learners to pay for high fares in order to have a command of a foreign language.
In conclusion, the travel industry seemingly has been startled by technology, but the worries that virtual reality will replace holidays when travelers build up personal connections to the world are overstated. When people expect to experience the thrill during exploration to new environment or be exposed to distinct cultures, that being said, internet is something more like a means to get ourselves prepared for a real tour.
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Full time students should take a lot of time to study but it is also essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, while, after all, as to, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08240534521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88672872163 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579064587973 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.265983108 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.133333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9333333333 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934728447726 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290936186575 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025812944029 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533852671832 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293201247328 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, while, after all, as to, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 449.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08240534521 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88672872163 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579064587973 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.265983108 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.133333333 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9333333333 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934728447726 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290936186575 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025812944029 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533852671832 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293201247328 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.