Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There have always been voices that argue against the use of weapons by law enforcement, even in legitimate situations, due to concerns about escalating violence and crime. I do not think that there is much correlation between arming police officers and increased crime.
From a hypothetical perspective, over-militarized police officers or armed ones who just lack of protocol and ethical training may create an atmosphere of tension and fear, making individuals more likely to react with aggression or resistance. Likewise, if the suspects are also armed, a verbal confrontation is likely to turn into a gun battle. On the other hand, by shifting towards alternative to using force, like negation, non-lethal tools and techniques, this escalated high-risk situation would be reduced.
While it cannot be entirely accurate to solely blame armed police officers for causing more violence and crime, there are certain situations where the use of firearms by law enforcement can be justified to deter potential crimes and ensure public safety more effectively. It is also important to acknowledge it is not weaponizing police but social factors and regulations, including the legality of civilian firearm ownership in some countries, added to economic recession and high unemployment, that contribute significantly to higher levels of crimes. Even with other de-escalation tactics and tools in place, it will be challenging to mitigate the conflicts and tension between police and criminals through peaceful means without addressing these underlying issues.
In conclusion, permission of the use of forceful interventions may heighten the levels of violence especially if used unnecessarily or indiscriminately. However, there are also situations where weapon use by police officers is imperative to prevent further harm.
- Full time students should take a lot of time to study but it is also essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 84
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world more people share the same language Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this 89
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: mitigating
... tools in place, it will be challenging to mitigate the conflicts and tension between polic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, may, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67153284672 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1807066636 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4281285075 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.4 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151049884636 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592404066182 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374517318922 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893610892721 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277127453838 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: mitigating
... tools in place, it will be challenging to mitigate the conflicts and tension between polic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, may, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67153284672 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1807066636 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4281285075 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.4 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151049884636 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592404066182 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374517318922 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893610892721 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277127453838 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.