Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Police officers are those who are responsible for the maintenance of law, order, and peace in society. They have the authority to carry guns to protect the citizens from criminals and offenders. While it has been argued that having police officers carry guns could encourage a higher level of violence, I believe that police officers carrying guns does not necessarily promote violence.
The mere fact that there is increased risk of accidental shootings generates the claim that police officers carrying guns can lead to a higher level of violence. When a police officer has a gun in their possession, there is always a chance that it could go off, either unintentionally or deliberately. For instance, some officers may become trigger-happy and use their weapons more frequently than necessary, leading to fatal shootings that could have been avoided. In other instances, when police officers are faced with difficult situations, they may resort to using their weapons rather than attempting to resolve the issue through other means, such as communication or negotiation. This could further complicate the situation and could put the public at risk.
However, it is not accurate to say that police officers carrying guns automatically leads to a higher level of violence. Firstly, police officers need to protect themselves from armed offenders, and having a firearm is often the only way of doing so. There have been plenty of instances where police officers' lives have been saved by the use of their firearms. Without them, their safety would be severely compromised, and their ability to protect the public would be drastically reduced. Moreover, police officers undergo intense training, including firearm training, to ensure they can use their guns safely and responsibly. They must also adhere to strict protocols when using their guns, such as only using deadly force as a last resort. This training and the protocols that they must adhere to helps minimize the risk of violence.
In conclusion, while some may argue that police officers carrying guns promotes violence, the reality is much more complicated. The use of firearms is a necessary component in the police force's ability to keep communities safe from harm, despite of chances that accidental or unnecessary use could occur.
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27792915531 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74429264339 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50408719346 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.773128447 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.941176471 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264846629003 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100687322098 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996458937126 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188653793434 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665324712865 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.