Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
We live in a world where the significance of living locations has been growing by leaps and bounds which raises the question of whether living in different cities or staying in one place is more beneficial for humans during their lifetime. Personally, despite a small number of opposing views, I firmly adhere to the fact that moving around and living in different spots is extremely beneficial for curious people like me. The main reason why I feel this way can be attributed to two factors including gaining new practical experiences and having a new lifestyle, which will be explored thoroughly in the following essay.
To begin with, there are many reasons why moving around and living in different cities can benefit humans. First, some valuable experiences could be gained by living in various places. In other words, those living in several cities in their lifetime have more opportunities to improve their practical skills. As they meet new people, new cultures, and different societies. For example, I left my hometown and came to Tehran to look for a better life 10 years ago. When I arrived, I was too shy and suffered from a lack of communication skills, However, after I started working, attending some community groups, and meeting new people and cultures, I tackled this problem. Thus, the more humans live in a new society, the more they can overcome problems and become more experienced.
Another reason that makes me believe staying in a town for a long time is not the greatest way to live could be living a new lifestyle. This means that every country even every city has its exclusive lifestyle. That means people who live in megacities have a different daily routine than those who live in small towns and rural areas. For instance, those living in rural areas usually never experience stressful situations, however, those growing up in a big city or industrial spots are familiar with these situations. In contrast, those living in rural areas have a relaxed lifestyle which can be experienced by moving and living in these cities. As a result, meeting new and different cities has beneficial impacts.
To conclude, Although living in different places is money and time-consuming, I firmly believe that the experience we earn is totally worth it. Due to the fact that moving around and seeing various places could improve the motivation for living. If people keep moving to different cities, they will be motivated and experienced.
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life/family/leisure and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 85
- Should schools provide organized activities for children after lessons end? 77
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? 11
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...rowing by leaps and bounds which raises the question of whether living in different cities or staying i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ing their lifetime. Personally, despite a small number of opposing views, I firmly adhere to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in contrast, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00975609756 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67501716541 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.364433654 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.105263158 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188945728889 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592761107105 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389007075058 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115900834801 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239959145719 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.