The table shows the income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998
The given table illustrates the figure for income spending by adults and children on the four common items in the UK, which are food, electronic equipment, music, and video, measured in percentage, counted in 1998. Overall, it is evident that food and music were the most popular products purchased by adults and children, respectively. In addition, women seemed to buy more food, while girls’ biggest spending was on music.
In terms of food, women spent their income just below 40 percent, outnumbering the percentage of spending allocated by adults and men for the same item by 14 percent and 25 percent respectively. Girls, however, only allocated their spending on food for 11 percent, followed by those of children and boys roughly one-tenth each.l Moreover, adults, men, and women merely had 5 percent of their income on music. In contrast, the largest proportion was owned by girls about 40 percent, eclipsing those of children and boys for nearly 2 percent.
As shown in the table, electronic equipment accounted for 23 percent of children, 18 percent of boys, and 5 percent of girls’ income. Although women only spent their earnings one percent on the devices, adults and men allocated 5 percent and 10 percent respectively. Lastly, recorded as the least favorable item for boys, girls, and children, videos only made up between 12 percent and eighty percent of their income. On the other hand, the rest of the groups spent not more than two percent on these.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boys roughly one-tenth each.l Moreover, adults, men, and women merely had 5 perc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, lastly, moreover, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04897959184 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60453581862 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526530612245 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6677736181 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124125273928 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058625658962 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879160336127 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955963943463 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544876178949 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boys roughly one-tenth each.l Moreover, adults, men, and women merely had 5 perc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, lastly, moreover, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04897959184 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60453581862 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526530612245 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6677736181 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.7 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124125273928 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058625658962 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879160336127 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955963943463 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544876178949 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.