Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning is a lifelong process that can benefit almost every member of society. Different people have different preferences when it comes to learning. From my perspective, reading books provides better learning experiences than watching movies.
First, although people can encounter something new from movies, it is an inefficient learning medium compared to reading books. One of the factors explaining their differences can be the setting. Most people watch movies in movie theaters with dark lighting and loud sounds, making them hard to concentrate on meaningful things. Not to mention that their friends might be accompanying them, talking from time to time. Distractions like these make proper learning out of the question. For example, the only thing left in people’s minds days after a movie might be how the actors look or the background music. However, if people choose to read books, they will find it much easier to focus. The reason is that reading happens in quiet environments, such as bedrooms, libraries, or study areas. These noise-free places allow people to focus their minds on things that need time and effort to comprehend without being interrupted, helping them learn faster and harder.
Second, watching movies deprives people of the chance of creative thinking. Movies today have fanciful special effects that can distort the boundary between fantasy and reality. These effects can ensure enjoyable viewing experiences but may hinder people’s learning abilities. To be precise, when people have enough visual stimuli, they will stop envisioning the events themselves. As a result, watching movies makes it hard for people to practice their imagination, weakening their creative thinking abilities. Contrarily, books only provide written details, which means people will almost always need to think about the scenarios described in books solely on their understanding of the written description. During this process, they will inevitably need to recall information they have stored earlier and apply it to the scenario described in the books. Remembering and using already learned knowledge can enhance memory and make newly attained knowledge from books an integral part of their knowledge system, ultimately improving learning quality.
To conclude, learning from books is more efficient and quality than from movies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-23 | rodriannnn | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | neilyuan | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age 76
- Is job sharing good for workers Job sharing is a type of part time employment in which one position can be shared by two part time workers that is the two people share the work hours and pay of one job Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who ha 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many countries are paying attention to environmental problems But the attention is not making the environmental situations better 81
- Some say that people should make others important influential people or potential employers know about their strengths and accomplishments Otherwise they will not have a successful life What is your opinion on this statement Explain why 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56824512535 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6627078826 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601671309192 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.701719978 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1904761905 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306626701341 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905686116626 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463672401289 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182494199301 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055158140513 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.