The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of the country's citizens
The effectiveness of a leader can be measured in various ways when it comes to a the well-being of a country. The leader is responsible for the overall status of his/her country. Many countries have gained a variety of accolades in various fields like military, scientific innovations, or even the commonwealth games. It sometimes happens that a country which has the largest military is said to be a great superpower. Or if a country has the most scientific discoveries, it is said to leading in the fields of science, technology, etc. This does not give us an overall picture of the well-being of the country's citizens. Aspects like poverty ratio, healthcare or even education of the citizens must be considered while making a decision of the well-being of a country and the effectiveness of its leader at the same time.
A country cannot be judged to be great solely on the basis of its accolades in military or various scientific innovations. And the leader cannot be said to be effectively positive on the county's behalf for these mere reasons. Let's take for example a country who has the greatest military power. This country will be considered a superpower for sure and the leader might also be feared by many. But what if the same country has a shortage of water supply? Or what if the poverty of the country is very high? The leader cannot be considered to be doin well for the country in this context.
In a country like India, which has some of the most wealthy people, there are a huge number of beggars and poor people. In order to improve the situation, if there are daily supplies of food and water to these beggars and plans are being carries out to reduce the poverty, then the government or the leader sitting at the top of the nation's hierarchy is said to be doing well. Many African countries lack to provide formal education. A leader should be willing to take steps in order to make sure that the all the citizens are educated so that the literacy rate rises and it can be of good use to the country.
To sum up, a leader can be considered to be effective if the general well-being of the citizens of his/her nation is good. There achievements that a country gains contribute very little to the overall image of the country. But at the end, it is the mere day-to-day necessities of the citizens that are to be fulfilled. If a leader is able to achieve this, then the leader is said to be effective.
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of the country s citizens 50
- Slimville city residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that their exercise habits confirms more closely to what doctors and health practitioners recommend than they did seven years ago During those seven years m 58
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the 60
- The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of West Egg Two years ago our consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past two years however town 69
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...asured in various ways when it comes to a the well-being of a country. The leader is ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... countys behalf for these mere reasons. Lets take for example a country who has the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...or the leader sitting at the top of the nations hierarchy is said to be doing well. Man...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58620689655 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7000447729 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425287356322 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9402175924 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6818181818 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7727272727 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499534939775 0.243740707755 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168579934876 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810728474782 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353816512954 0.150359130593 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713533721243 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.