Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
There is some dispute whether animals are given too much care and effort in or oorder preserve them. In my opinion, I disagree with this view since the benefits from preservation wild animals would overshadow its drawbacks.
Some people may argue that the time and money should be spent on other urgent priorities such as climate changes and hunger around the world. However, this thinking is flaw, as protection of wild life also implies the maintainance our planet. First, animals and birds play a significant role in retain the diversity of the ecosytem. Because of this, any disapperance of a single spiece would pose a threat to the balance of the nature. In addition, losses of certain animals if happened, would place many human's livelihood at risks. To illustrate, as people tend to kill snakes due to their scareness of the animal, rodents which are the favourite prey of snakes could thrive and damage crops. Thus, by conserving living creatures, other issues caused by nature and human beings may be alliviated simultaneously.
More importantly, with increasing time and energy are devoted to safeguard wild animals and birds against natural and human factors, the valuable genes of these creatures are retained. These can be used as sources for many researches which may hold the key to human cure against uncurable diseases for the time being. This is crucial in guaranteeing the existence of humankind. Likewise, animals and birds have economic values. This is particularly the case for pig, chickens which are commonly known as a source of meat for people. Therefore, the survival of animals and birds indicate the co-existence of human life in many ways.
In sum, even though pressurevation of living creatures may takes great amount of different resources, it is essential to the development of our world. I believe it is necessary since it is enormously beneficial for us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | ngo viet | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
- Widespread of technology has given people more freedom to work instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage 89
- Leaders and directors in organizations are normally older people Some people think having a younger leader would be better To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- It is thought by some that life is better in a city Others however prefer life in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...n animals if happened, would place many humans livelihood at risks. To illustrate, as ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09003215434 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76312636315 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607717041801 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7096707803 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1176470588 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206511755215 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591828878659 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631681577101 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112285722283 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800553932975 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.