The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentage of different languages spoken by British students at one university in England in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, Spanish was the most spoken language in addition to English in both years, with German being the least spoken one. The proportions for all languages changed only a bit over the period given.
As can be seen from the chart, in 2000, a third of all British students were able to speak Spanish, and the figure rose to 35% in 2010. The proportion of people who could speak another language also saw an increase from 15% in 2000 to 20% in 2010. Moreover, another rise could be seen in the percentage of students who were good at two other languages.
By contrast, at the beginning of the period, there were 15% of students proficient in French, but they accounted for only 10% 10 years later. The same is true for the figure of people who spoke no other language apart from English, dropping to 10% by 2010. By contrast, surprisingly, the population of German speakers remained constant at 10% throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan52 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980 1990 and 2000 and the world s top exporters of fish in 2000 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrast, at the beginning of the period, there were 15% of students proficient in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, third, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77540106952 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51626866524 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561497326203 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.472203377 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444655357837 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16855322072 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103869130987 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258164687438 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113811511334 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.