The given table illustrates the entire value while the pie charts describe the percentage of fish that the United States bought from three different areas in 1988, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, it can easily be seen that the US spent more and more money buying fish from 1988 to 2000. It is also clear that the amount of fish imported from Canada was the highest in the first year but then decreased while China and other countries became the main sources over the whole period.
Looking more at the table for more data, over the 12-year period, the value of imported fish increased dramatically in the US. This figure increased significantly from 6.57 billion dollars to 8.52 billion and 10.72 billion in 1992 and 2000 respectively.\
In terms òf the three pie charts, In 1988, 60 percent of the fish supplied in the US came from Canada, by 2000, that percentage had dramatically dropped to only 28 percent. The figure for China, on the other hand, increased more two times from 13% to 30%. Fish imports by Americans from other countries increased from 46% in 1992 to 42% in 2000. Other nations grew to be the major souces with 46% in 1992 and finally reached 42% in 2000.
The two bar graphs demonstrate the number of residents as well as birth and death rate of England and Wales over a period of 300 years starting from 1700 .
Overall, It can clearly be observed from the charts that the figure for population witnessed an upward trend.In terms of birth and death rates, the proportion of birth rate was always higher than death during the given period.
Looking at the first graph for more data,in 1700, there was merely 8 million people in two listed countries. This number rose substantially to roughly 16 million and 38 million in 1800 and 1900 respectively.The population of Wales and England continued growing over the following years and finally reached its peak at nearly 48 million in the last year of the period.
With regard to the second chart, the birth rate was just under 10 per 1000 in 1700 and surged to about 22 per 1000 before decreasing to almost 10 in 2000. The death rate trend was similar to the birth rate trend. This proportion increased from 6 per 1000 to 17 per 1000 in the first century and lasly accounted for 5.
- The pictures below show how tea is produced They also illustrate the process of making a cup of tea 78
- This pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 93
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 78
- The first chart shows the population of England and wales between 1700 and 200 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rate in the same countries in the same period 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aphs demonstrate the number of residents as well as birth and death rate of Engla...
^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...a period of 300 years starting from 1700 . Overall, It can clearly be observed fr...
^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...or population witnessed an upward trend.In terms of birth and death rates, the pro...
^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...Looking at the first graph for more data,in 1700, there was merely 8 million people...
^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...8 million in 1800 and 1900 respectively.The population of Wales and England continu...
^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o about 22 per 1000 before decreasing to almost 10 in 2000. The death rate trend...
^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to almost 10 in 2000. The death rate trend was similar to the birth rate tren...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, second, well, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6335078534 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41643654616 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586387434555 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2608580379 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0589223493476 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281724999189 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256174872936 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375572901945 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241780099446 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.