Some people think that technological development can reduce crime, while others think that it would encourage crime. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
In this day and age, it is generally believed that the advancement of technology can minimize the criminal rate. However, others are opposed this statement as it makes the illegal actions to be more severe. The following paper will look at both sides of the problem as well as giving my own opinion.
On the one hand, technological devices such as cameras and alarming, which are security systems has helped people to track the crimes on street more effectively. For example, when there is a robber on the street which police may find it hard to track and arrest them, they could follow the footages being saved in the memory system of the camera to identify the stealer. Therefore, this would reinforce the safety for its citizens as well as warning those who have intention to get involved in illegal actions. Furthermore, with the application of fingerprint in accessing organizations, this could prevent strangers or even terrorists to enter the places due to destructive intention. Taking America as an example, this country was terrorized because of having no protective procedures leading to many terrorists entering the organizations and bombed causing numerous deceases. As a result, if registered fingerprints are used in the security system, strangers will not be able to enter the places as well as having no granted rights to access certain database of them.
On the other hand, technological advancement is also believed to increase crime rate. The first reason is that with the widespread of the internet. Many individuals can use it to make transactions in terms of trading weapons. To illustrate, inhabitants residing in America are allowed to use weapons freely if they have licenses. Therefore, they are more likely to take advantages of this to earn more profit, especially wrongdoers. In order to reduce this issue, governments need to take action as they are the top managerial of the country. In particular, national government should impose regulations to prohibit its dwellers to use weapon except emergency. Consequently, people are more likely to be protected and have a safer life.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that although technological development can alleviate the crime rate, there are still some negative aspects of this phenomenon which require governments to be responsible for.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-23 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
- the pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- more and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands what are the reasons do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period 15 years 73
- the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... will look at both sides of the problem as well as giving my own opinion. On the one ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27320954907 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98761123796 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57824933687 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3709878731 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12845555931 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404507766374 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504433545358 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921298405516 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370549469662 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.