Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation's history. However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
Nowadays, some people argue that ancient buildings ought to be demolished in order to create more space for modern ones. In my opinion, old buildings still play a significant role in the country's development and history should not be considered expendable. Therefore it is necessary for governments to preserve them.
Some buildings constructed a long time ago are an indispensable part of the country's history as they are the cultural heritage. Every country has its own cultural values, and historical buildings are the ones that differentiate a country from the others. Hence, if we destroy these buildings, all historical and cultural values will be lost and every country will look like the same. In addition, by visiting these buildings, foreigners and local people can learn about the nation's history and all of the achievements that the ancestors had made. For instance, The Imperial City of Hue, which is located at Hue City in Vietnam, is a glorious architecture that preserve precious heritage from the reign of Nguyen Dynasty. Visiting this place, people will be able to have knowledge and even experience the past life of the royal family.
Although maintaining old buildings requires an enormous amount of money, they benefit the country rather than hindering its development. Governments can repair these buildings and change them into tourist attractions by allowing traders to open souvenir shops or cafes inside and nearby. This, in turn, will effectively entice tourists to visit these places and greatly improve the country's economy.
In conclusion, I believe that old buildings are very important to the country and they should not be knocked down. Instead, governments should renovate these buildings so that they can contribute to the development of the country.
- The map and chart below show the information for the global willingness to eat insect products and the current price for certain food available on the market place Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise t 67
- People who read of pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 73
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ry should not be considered expendable. Therefore it is necessary for governments to pres...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...rs and local people can learn about the nations history and all of the achievements tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...can learn about the nations history and all of the achievements that the ancestors had mad...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32042253521 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82408195721 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.979682014 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.928571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291924780641 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105224599393 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905530242938 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20105606988 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749157135881 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.