The internet is probably the most significant invention of the last 30 years. Without it, our lives would be completely different. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s modern society, many people from around the world dispute whether human lives without the initiative to connect people and to meet all demands of searching for information or the latest news such as the Internet would have a remarkable change. Although a myriad of citizens assert that their lives in particular and human lives, in general, will witness a fluctuation of habit routine if the Internet does not exist. I personally completely agree with this statement.
There are several rationales to acknowledge that lacking the Internet would trigger an inimical impact on their living conditions. The most significant reason is that a world without the Internet would cause a detrimental influence on the development of many countries' industries. This is because the Internet has a considerable involvement to make occupants from all over the world have a certain knowledge of each field that they engage in. This is perfectly exemplified in the case of a scientist's theory established with an aim to elucidate that from many situations humans from the last 30 years have been utterly indispensable to the Internet. As a result, a majority of people claim that living without the Internet is a disaster for human civilization.
Another compelling reason is that the Internet has a sustainable role in making contacts throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This is mainly due to the fact that residents from each nation will have a quarantine with an aim to stamp out the spreading of COVID virus. For instance, In Vietnam in 2019, the communist party coordinated with the 63 regional authority leaders to enact a resolution forcing all of the people residing in Vietnam to minimize their interaction. Because of this emergency situation, many schools and companies had to shut down all activities and began to rely on social network services related to the Internet. Therefore, humans prevalently depend on the Internet to continue their living habits.
In conclusion, although there are many contentious perspectives on the Internet, I still believe that the Internet has an unsuspicious influence on human lives. It is advisable for people to acknowledge the essential contribution of Internet invention and to learn how to utilize the Internet effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-17 | HuyenHuyen11 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-06 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
- The diagrams below show two methods of using water to produce electricity 82
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 84
- The chart below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the Anthropologists in work after five years 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
... perfectly exemplified in the case of a scientists theory established with an aim to eluci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y leaders to enact a resolution forcing all of the people residing in Vietnam to minimize ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29201101928 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98374196553 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531680440771 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4811991051 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.066666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183629857869 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694510209584 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456634446372 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117689981252 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534178482871 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.