Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger. However, children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
It is the principal duty of parents and teachers to protect their children from dangers, instil good behaviour and mould them into good individuals. They should adapt all possible means to work towards this purpose. Hence, putting some certain rules of behaviour and limiting their freedom seems essential.
To begin with, there are several reasons that ensure the need of rules in children’s life. Firstly, children are innocent and more vulnerable than adults and easily get attracted to various things which might be harmful in various ways. Thus, stricter rules ensure that children obey them and remain disciplined. This also helps them to concentrate on task allotted to them which ultimately results in better academic performance and good social behaviour. Secondly, firm rules make children more cultured and well behaved finally leads them better human beings. In addition, restricting their freedom protects them from some evils in society, for example, smoking or drug addiction. Otherwise children get driven away from basic responsibility of getting good education.
However, some advocates of child freedom assert that limiting children to some rules for their development may give risk to a dislike in them towards their family and school. This may also hinder their holistic development as the basic nature of kids to play and experiment is not fulfilled. Moreover, instead of imposing rules, parents and teachers should be well behaved to make their children like them.
To conclude, children’s total freedom should not be snatched. However, imposing desired rules and giving required freedom would certainly mould children into better citizens. Moreover, children also stay protected from possible dangers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | vishal sachdeva | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | roopdeep | 68 | view |
| 2015-06-11 | kshama.singhania@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2015-06-11 | mouniat | 87 | view |
- The cost of air flights has reduced sharply nowadays Do you think it is a positive or a negative development give your reasons 78
- Some people think that government should subsidize fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper Others argue that tax should be set on unhealthy food Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 36
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 73
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...for example, smoking or drug addiction. Otherwise children get driven away from basic res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53962264151 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55222698531 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5085926141 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355044905341 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123561444296 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667326021073 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230226493427 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050690175375 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.