The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011
Age group Female Male
0 - 9 51.3 50.3
10 - 17 42.2 24.6
18 - 39 17.1 9.7
40 - 59 12.3 8.0
60+ 18.5 13.2
The table compares the proportion of people at different ages of a town who travelled by bike in 2011
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of female cyclists was by far higher than male cyclists in the period shown. In addition, most people who rode bicycles fell into the 0-9 age group whereas the opposite was true for the age group 40-59.
Among five groups, under 9 - year - old females and males experienced the highest proportion of cyclists, which were 51.3% and 50.3% respectively. However, this figures for both genders tended to decline as people grew older (10-17), with 42.2% of females and 24.6% of males. As for the 18-19 age group, the percentages of both genders travelled by bike declined even more significantly, at about a third of the 10-17 group’s figures.
Regarding the two oldest group, there was just 12.3% of females in their 40s and 50s used bike, 4.3% higher than the figure for males. By contrast, the popularity of cyclists increased when people reached 60 or over, accounting for 18.5% of females and 13.2% of males.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | urluve6969 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | duyentran217 | 10 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | duyentran217 | view | |
| 2020-07-03 | Kady Truong | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-08 | nghialeminh | 42 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a town who travelled by bike in 2011 Overall, it is clear that the percentage...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, whereas, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88950276243 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50835743619 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646408839779 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0484327357 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379822379353 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157730408929 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731215747856 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204909303917 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580093193298 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.