In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses, so people can build houses in their own style rather than building them with the same style or the old houses in the local area. Do advantages outweigh dissdvantages?
In modern day, people are comfortable in setting up their houses as a result of having no strict limitations on architecture. In my opinion, i believe whether the pros of this tendency overshadow the cons or not really depends on the places where new buildings are constructed.
On the one hand, no border in producing structure of a building will bear some benefits. First of all, it creats a condition for creativity that allows architects and owers to be more open to new ideas to freely experiment with different materials and designs, which might finally lead to the arrival of more innovative and unique buildings. Take the Saigon Notre Dam Catheral as an example, it does not need to comply with the surrounding building styles. With distinctive beautiful complex french architectural features, which generate vivid images for the area and energetic atmosphere, and becoming the ultimate symbol HCM city. Secondly, the freedom to choose the shape of houses or buildings throws an opportunity to owners to show their personal perferences, while some may be passionate about traditional design, others might enjoy a more modern one.
On the other hand, if the authorities do not set a specific system of regulations about building design that can cause a crucial problem in certain regions. In fact. There are places where the way of designing houses serve particular purposes, for example, to illustrate local area's cultural and historic values. For instance, Hoi An where is a well-known destination attracts millions of tourist each year with traditional beauty. Therefore, when a house is built followed by modern style, it will ruin the look of the city. As a consequence, the number of visitors coming there will decrease that damages the economy.
In conclusion, whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of little control on building design counts on the local area and their purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics
- Some people think movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tations on architecture. In my opinion, i believe whether the pros of this tenden...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19741100324 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86663078934 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621359223301 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9426616649 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5384615385 7.06120827912 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286212226953 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830696742309 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711741998903 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18163915654 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592581619298 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...tations on architecture. In my opinion, i believe whether the pros of this tenden...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19741100324 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86663078934 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621359223301 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9426616649 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5384615385 7.06120827912 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286212226953 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830696742309 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711741998903 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18163915654 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592581619298 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.