Fewer young people choose to work in farming. What are the reasons?
Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
There is no denying that agriculture is one of the major aspects of most nations. In light of this, a decrease in young people choosing to work in farming has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although this is because of the deficiency of economic opportunities, I believe the young still should be encouraged to work in the farming field.
There are some reasons why many more young people refuse to do farming work. This is because they are not provided with financial prosperity. In a knowledge-based society, new generations tend to bias non-manual affairs and avoid labour works to their best possibility. Besides that, the farming field does not have a ladder structure which facilitates people to have a higher position and changes in life, so they hardly ever made a jump to enhance their living standards. In addition, farming works are usually in rural areas for vast space for fields and planting, so the environment might be less vivid compared to urban areas. Therefore, it does not fit the majority of young people’s preferences.
In my opinion, there is still a need to encourage young people to do farming work. This is because the young are the energetic and creative labour force to boost the national economy. Besides providing food sources for the citizens’ consumption, agricultural products are also potential export goods to the international market to cooperate, connect and exchange. With their constant approach to new trends of the modern day, young people can develop many outstanding campaigns.
In conclusion, the fall of young people deciding to work in farming can be explained by the scarce chances of improving their living conditions and preferences. In front of this, they should be encouraged to participate in farming work with potential financial promises for the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- The pictures illustrate the innovations of the Nature Museum from 2010 to 2013 61
- the maps below show the layout of nature museum between 2010 and 2013 61
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate Write a report descri 78
- Some people think space research is a waste of money The government should spend that money on the improvement of people s living conditions To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, therefore, as for, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16722408027 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86582069694 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551839464883 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9389789809 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.520058215169 0.244688304435 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185834419692 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158754235227 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349215789809 0.151304729494 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462534551079 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.