Question :Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Various unexpected circumstances might happen during a speach and saying something incorrect and misleading could be one of them. In my perspective, if the speaker suddenly use incorrect information in his speach, its better to wait until the session is over and then remind him the mistakes. I have two reasons to support my notion which I wil explore in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, everyone can make mistakes, specially during a prsentation or speach in which the lecturer is under a lot of pressure. These flaws can be rooted from anxiety, lack of concentration or information and it is truly contrdicts humanity moral ethics if we point out to them in front of audiences. This behaviour not only can make the lecturer feel ashamed in public but also can have detrimental effects on his mental health. My personal experience is a compelling example of this issue. If my memory serves me right, when I was joniour in collage I had to have a presentation about history of islamic architecture in middle east in front of my classmates and also three of my professors. Besides having social anxiety, I had a lot of stress for my very first time lecture in a semi-serious confrance. Although I took pills beforehead to feel more relaxed, In the middle of my presentation, I started to stutter so badly that I almost mispronounced three diffrenet important keywords in . One of my classmates, who will I never forgive, started laughing at me and shout out the correct pronounciations. Eventhough I finished my presention with a good grade, following that event, I have got PTSD and it is so hard for me to speak in public. If he had not call my mistakes in public, I would not have suffer from this disorder for such a long time.
Furthermore, when people intrupt someone speach, for any reason, it can harm his concetreation and he would loose the coherence of the sentences. Taking my aforementioned horrible experience into account, after my classmate started laughing and telling me the correct word, not only it did not help me to have a better lecture but it also made me to forget what I was talking about and loose the chain of my speach. This experience is a compelling example of how harmful behaviours can affect the meeting detrimentally and may cause unfortunate repercussions for the speaker, like as recieving bad grade or forgetting the rest of his speach.
In colcusion, I am of the opinion that if we confront a mistake or incorrect infrormation in a lecture, It is more polite to wait and remindthe correct information to the speaker in a proper time. If we intrupt the lecture, first, the lecturer might feel ashamed in front of the audiences and additionally, he might loose his concentration to hold his speach coherent.
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Directions You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage Typicall 3
- tpo50 integrated Writing 70
- TPO 37 https zabanexam com toefl sec 4 70
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'explores'.
Suggestion: explores
...easons to support my notion which I wil explore in the following paragraphs. To begin ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 996, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed three diffrenet important keywords in . One of my classmates, who will I never ...
^^
Line 2, column 1265, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'called'.
Suggestion: called
...or me to speak in public. If he had not call my mistakes in public, I would not have...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1310, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...my mistakes in public, I would not have suffer from this disorder for such a long time...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...can harm his concetreation and he would loose the coherence of the sentences. Taking ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore polite to wait and remindthe correct information to the speaker in a proper t...
^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...he audiences and additionally, he might loose his concentration to hold his speach co...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2282.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81434599156 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02145531884 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514767932489 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8429632712 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0762914498038 0.236089414692 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277781270111 0.076458572812 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338853114701 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618846696593 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376890650071 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.