No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
In this era where information and knowledge are growing at an exponential rate and findings in a domain are applied across other domains more than ever, the prompt states that for any field to progress, it must rely on information and findings from other fields. I mostly agree with the prompt. However, I do concede that some specific fields are relatively independent and can advance without extraneous knowledge from other domains.
Firstly, the majority of the fields in the present day world are directly based on other fields. And, most of the ideas of a field are based upon the results derived from another field. For example, the very existence of robotics, space-tech, engineering and other related fields are because of the proofs of the formulas and concepts of math. If math wouldn’t have existed, then most of the findings in the said fields would be uninterpretable. Therefore, it is to be understood that a field is based on the knowledge and information churned out by other fields and no field is absolutely independent.
Secondly, although there are some fields that are not entirely based on other fields, the advancement of the said fields mainly involves experiences and knowledge gained from other fields. For example, entrepreneurship is a field that appears as if it were independent and it could thrive without the intervention of any other fields. But, the whole point of entrepreneurship is to have domain knowledge and a specific problem to solve with the help of the said domain. Likewise, journalism, although appearing as an independent field, heavily relies on tech and other related fields for its advancement. This is evident from the fact that the whole world can learn about a fact that has happened seconds ago, which is a significant advancement directly caused by leveraging technology. Therefore, using the knowledge and experiences from other fields plays a pivotal role in advancing a field.
However, there exists some niche fields that are relatively independent of the other and the advancement of the field does not depend on any other extraneous knowledge. For example, psychology is a field that involves study of the behaviors of humans and the like, and to a major extent, has its own mysterious principles. Likewise, other fields like geography, sales, marketing, etc do not majorly depend on other fields for their advancement. Therefore, some fields can thrive independently without major assistance of ideas from other fields.
In conclusion, it is by leveraging the learnings and experiences of the other fields collectively, that a field can achieve significant progress. This is because advancement of the said field mainly leverages the learnings from other fields. Although, there appears to be some niche fields which appear to be independent, interdisciplinary research is very essential to advancing the collective knowledge of mankind as a whole.
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts 60
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2459.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25427350427 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01180121571 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41452991453 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4713112193 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.095238095 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397069576194 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159751756608 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965013123624 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273692637609 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562896513815 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.