Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Divergent views regarding hosting global sporting events can bring myriad certain merits for a nation. Although this stance is fiercely attacked, I am in opposition to it for some rational reasons.
On the one hand, it is undisputed that holding a huge international event costs a particular country a handsome amount of money . Take the World Cup 2022 as an exemplary model, it is assumed that Qatar set aside 220 billion USD for this massive competition. Perceptibly, that can lead to numerous financial problems in a country and a glaring demonstration of economic stagnation, both of which are likely to have an adverse impact on the resident’s quality of life.
On the other hand, I still hold onto the notion that a country can make a giant profit by accepting to be a host for a global sports event. To begin with, a host country is capable of propelling tourism by organizing these kinds of events. For instance, Qatar has welcomed an influx of more than 1 million tourists coming to their country this year for the World Cup, and it is proposed that this would generate over 2 billion USD for its economy in the next three years. Moreover, through holding sport-related events, a nation can arouse the residents’ interest in sports. In other words, inhabitants, especially youngsters, in a country can be inspired and promoted to do more physical activities in order to boost their health by allowing them to fully immerse themselves in the event.
To sum up, albeit a aforementioned demerit of hosting an international sports event, I do ascertain that this trend is advantageous to a country.
- Some people say that it is more important to spend money on improving roads and motorways than public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 61
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cular country a handsome amount of money . Take the World Cup 2022 as an exemplary...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... by accepting to be a host for a global sports event. To begin with, a host country is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir country this year for the World Cup, and it is proposed that this would gener...
^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to boost their health by allowing them to fully immerse themselves in the ...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...selves in the event. To sum up, albeit a aforementioned demerit of hosting an in...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, still, for instance, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93382352941 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92708145096 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2011967891 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22155682204 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838325354376 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03797974319 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140665994247 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221158946136 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.